<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outliers: The Story of Success &#8211; An Issue of Semantics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whakate.com/lead-articles/outliers-the-story-of-success-an-issue-of-semantics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whakate.com/lead-articles/outliers-the-story-of-success-an-issue-of-semantics/</link>
	<description>life design matters &#124; Journal &#38; Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:31:51 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Zeldes</title>
		<link>http://www.whakate.com/lead-articles/outliers-the-story-of-success-an-issue-of-semantics/comment-page-1/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whakate.com/?p=1008#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>Agreed, it&#039;s a very pleasant read (listen, in my case - the audio version is very well narrated by the author). 

And agreed, it isn&#039;t a rigorous scientific book, more a collection of generalizations from numerous anecdotes. The advantage is that it shares some interesting data you would not normally have known; what to do with the data remains the responsibility of the reader - isn&#039;t it always, though?

My own gripe is that it seems to gloss over the differences between necessary and sufficient conditions for success. That&#039;s where the difference between total predestination and the promise of self-improvement sits, after all. But this merely makes it more thought provoking, since you have to figure out for yourself what to make of it all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, it&#8217;s a very pleasant read (listen, in my case &#8211; the audio version is very well narrated by the author). </p>
<p>And agreed, it isn&#8217;t a rigorous scientific book, more a collection of generalizations from numerous anecdotes. The advantage is that it shares some interesting data you would not normally have known; what to do with the data remains the responsibility of the reader &#8211; isn&#8217;t it always, though?</p>
<p>My own gripe is that it seems to gloss over the differences between necessary and sufficient conditions for success. That&#8217;s where the difference between total predestination and the promise of self-improvement sits, after all. But this merely makes it more thought provoking, since you have to figure out for yourself what to make of it all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riscario</title>
		<link>http://www.whakate.com/lead-articles/outliers-the-story-of-success-an-issue-of-semantics/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>riscario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whakate.com/?p=1008#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>Interesting points. The book is certainly enjoyable and does make you think. As a family, we listened to the audiobook (which Gladwell reads) . While there is no step-by-step recipe for success, I found the book inspiring. While the successful had help along the way (like Steve Jobs asking Bill Packard for computer parts ... and getting them), they also prepared/rehearsed/practiced. 

Success = Preparation + Opportunity 

That&#039;s not the only formula. As you note, Style + Luck can also work. Thanks for your summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points. The book is certainly enjoyable and does make you think. As a family, we listened to the audiobook (which Gladwell reads) . While there is no step-by-step recipe for success, I found the book inspiring. While the successful had help along the way (like Steve Jobs asking Bill Packard for computer parts &#8230; and getting them), they also prepared/rehearsed/practiced. </p>
<p>Success = Preparation + Opportunity </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not the only formula. As you note, Style + Luck can also work. Thanks for your summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
