The Best of GTD and DIT

Home » Featured, Lead Articles 2 Comments Club forum discussions
Published: 8 December 2008 Author: Ilike Merey
Tell a Friend

We hear about David Allen’s GTD and Mark Forster’s DIT all the time, but what are the core principles underlying these two productivity systems? Whakate will explain the fundamental differences and how we can decide which one is more appropriate for the way our work is concentrated and the amount of control demanded by our lives.

Out of all of the personal productivity systems competing for our attention today, perhaps the two most successful are David Allen’s Getting Things Done (GTD) and Mark Forster’s Do It Tomorrow (DIT). We may know someone who swears by one of these systems, or may have wanted to dip into them ourselves, but GTD and DIT offer vastly different ways to get organised. Comparing them head to head, we can identify the one that fits our workload and personalities better—or even pick the features that appeal the most to create our own customised blend of the two.

The Core of Getting Things Done

GTD is, in many ways, the classic. Since Allen’s book appeared in 2001, it has swept through the world of task management and enjoys a loyal following. GTD’s core concepts revolve around capturing all the actions, ideas, thoughts and pieces of information that bombard us in everyday life. Many of us are under massive stress from physical information cluttering our work-space and unresolved appointments and projects haunting our brain.
View this book at AmazonGTD seeks to reduce the stress by getting all of that information out of the brain, off of the desk and recording it into a trusted system. When we record all the random “stuff,” it becomes physical. Our minds are released from constant worry, allowing us to concentrate on completing tasks and projects. Once we have a way to process all the information coming to us, we can determine what to do with it—and how to get it all done.

The Principles of GTD

GTD is a system in which you collect, process, organise and review all the information that comes into your life and then do all actions derived from them.

    Collect: All incoming information or “stuff” has to be collected in a so-called bucket: an inbox, PDA or anything you prefer. Every scrap of information from a take-out menu to an office memo ends up in the in-box, which is regularly emptied.

    Process: How we empty the buckets. Items are taken one at a time and evaluated. If it’s an action, it needs to be done immediately (under two minute action) or delegated to the appropriate persons, or deferred for ourselves. If an item is a non-action, it needs to be thrown away, or appropriately filed.

    Organise: Now actions are organised according to their status and dealt with. Actions are either Next Action (there is a next logical step towards completing them), Projects (what Allen calls “open-loops” that take more than one action step to complete), Waiting For (have been delegated and we now wait for results), or Someday/Maybe (any non-actionable data/ideas that you may want to access later)…

If you enjoyed the article "The Best of GTD and DIT " - why don't you read more about the Whakate Way.




Tell a Friend

2 Comments » Leave Your Comment

  • Longstreet said:

    This is an excellent article comparing the two time management approaches. I have used both — more GTD than DIT, bur recently have tried DIT. I am one of those exceedingly busy people due to my postion in administration and research. I really do love the DIT approach, but I am afraid I cannot make it work. I simply have too many commitments to juggle and too many inputs to function with a closed list — and complete the list every day. Even if I use a 3-5 day cycle as Mark suggests, I still cannot complete the list. I need the flexibility that GTD allows where I can move things back and forth from a someday/maybe list — the proverbial back-burner. My priorities change rapidly and I need a system that allows me this flexibility. Interestingly, I like the more rigid DIT approach — mainly for its simplicity. Oh well….

    Besy regards to all,
    Longstreet

  • i. Merey said:

    There is nothing wrong with preferring the more rigid
    approach if that is what truly works for you! :)
    The only problem is when we try to force ourselves into
    it.

Related Posts:

Do you want to discuss the article "The Best of GTD and DIT" with your fellow club members? Join the Club forum discussions or leave your comment below: