<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best of GTD and DIT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whakate.com/lead-articles/the-best-of-gtd-and-dit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whakate.com/lead-articles/the-best-of-gtd-and-dit/</link>
	<description>life design matters &#124; Journal &#38; Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:30:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: i. Merey</title>
		<link>http://www.whakate.com/lead-articles/the-best-of-gtd-and-dit/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>i. Merey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whakate.com/?p=316#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>There is nothing wrong with preferring the more rigid 
approach if that is what truly works for you! :)
The only problem is when we try to force ourselves into
it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing wrong with preferring the more rigid<br />
approach if that is what truly works for you! :)<br />
The only problem is when we try to force ourselves into<br />
it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longstreet</title>
		<link>http://www.whakate.com/lead-articles/the-best-of-gtd-and-dit/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Longstreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whakate.com/?p=316#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent article comparing the two time management approaches.  I have used both -- more GTD than DIT, bur recently have tried DIT.  I am one of those exceedingly busy people due to my postion in administration and research.  I really do love the DIT approach, but I am afraid I cannot make it work.  I simply have too many commitments to juggle and too many inputs to function with a closed list -- and complete the list every day.  Even if I use a 3-5 day cycle as Mark suggests, I still cannot complete the list.  I need the flexibility that GTD allows where I can move things back and forth from a someday/maybe list -- the proverbial back-burner.  My priorities change rapidly and I need a system that allows me this flexibility.  Interestingly, I like the more rigid DIT approach -- mainly for its simplicity.  Oh well....

Besy regards to all,
Longstreet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent article comparing the two time management approaches.  I have used both &#8212; more GTD than DIT, bur recently have tried DIT.  I am one of those exceedingly busy people due to my postion in administration and research.  I really do love the DIT approach, but I am afraid I cannot make it work.  I simply have too many commitments to juggle and too many inputs to function with a closed list &#8212; and complete the list every day.  Even if I use a 3-5 day cycle as Mark suggests, I still cannot complete the list.  I need the flexibility that GTD allows where I can move things back and forth from a someday/maybe list &#8212; the proverbial back-burner.  My priorities change rapidly and I need a system that allows me this flexibility.  Interestingly, I like the more rigid DIT approach &#8212; mainly for its simplicity.  Oh well&#8230;.</p>
<p>Besy regards to all,<br />
Longstreet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
